<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Wii Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flagrantdisregard.com/review-wii-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flagrantdisregard.com/review-wii-music/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:08:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://flagrantdisregard.com/review-wii-music/#comment-396410</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flagrantdisregard.com/?p=1791#comment-396410</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Songsmith is horrible. The ad was low budget, obviously---I read somewhere that the development team financed it themselves because it&#039;s not an official MS product. But as a software &lt;em&gt;toy&lt;/em&gt; (as opposed to a &lt;em&gt;game&lt;/em&gt; which implies goal-focused play or a &lt;em&gt;tool&lt;/em&gt;)... if it gets people singing and having fun... that&#039;s Good.

Plus, the underlying technology is very interesting: software that analyzes singing and detects pitch and tempo. With some evolutionary improvements in the quality of the musical output, I predict entire pop music albums produced by one singer and one producer---no band required (and the singer doesn&#039;t have to be able to sing either). Pop music is already most of the way there. Which is why I don&#039;t listen to much pop music. ;-) But it&#039;s interesting tech anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Songsmith is horrible. The ad was low budget, obviously&#8212;I read somewhere that the development team financed it themselves because it&#8217;s not an official MS product. But as a software <em>toy</em> (as opposed to a <em>game</em> which implies goal-focused play or a <em>tool</em>)&#8230; if it gets people singing and having fun&#8230; that&#8217;s Good.</p>
<p>Plus, the underlying technology is very interesting: software that analyzes singing and detects pitch and tempo. With some evolutionary improvements in the quality of the musical output, I predict entire pop music albums produced by one singer and one producer&#8212;no band required (and the singer doesn&#8217;t have to be able to sing either). Pop music is already most of the way there. Which is why I don&#8217;t listen to much pop music. ;-) But it&#8217;s interesting tech anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curly</title>
		<link>http://flagrantdisregard.com/review-wii-music/#comment-396407</link>
		<dc:creator>Curly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flagrantdisregard.com/?p=1791#comment-396407</guid>
		<description>I blogged about &lt;a href=&quot;http://curly15.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/microsoft-songsmith/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Songsmith&lt;/a&gt; too today, it&#039;s horrible, but amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blogged about <a href="http://curly15.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/microsoft-songsmith/" rel="nofollow">Songsmith</a> too today, it&#8217;s horrible, but amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

